IV.6 · Open & Closed Sets — Problem 6 #
← Back to IV. Open & Closed Sets, Problem 6
Problem. Let \(T \subseteq S\) and write \(T'\) for its set of limit points. (a) Show that \(T'\) is closed. (b) Show that \(p \in T'\) iff every ball \(B_\epsilon(p)\) contains infinitely many points of \(T\). (c) Find \(T \subseteq \mathbb{R}\) with \(T' \neq \varnothing\) but \(T \cap T' = \varnothing\), and \(T \subseteq \mathbb{R}\) with \(T' = \mathbb{R}\).
Hint #
For (a), use the theorem that a set is closed iff it contains all its limit points: so you must show that a limit point of \(T'\) is itself a limit point of \(T\). Given \(p \in (T')'\), find a point \(q \in T'\) close to \(p\), then a point of \(T\) close to \(q\), and arrange the radii so that this point lands inside your ball about \(p\) without being \(p\). For (b), if a ball contained only finitely many points of \(T\), shrink it to exclude them all.
Solution #
(a) By the theorem characterizing closed sets, it suffices to show \((T')' \subseteq T'\). Let \(p\) be a limit point of \(T'\) and let \(\epsilon > 0\). Then \(B_\epsilon(p)\) contains some \(q \in T'\) with \(q \neq p\). Put \(\delta = \min\{\rho(p,q),\ \epsilon - \rho(p,q)\} > 0\). The ball \(B_\delta(q)\) lies inside \(B_\epsilon(p)\) by the triangle inequality, and does not contain \(p\) because \(\rho(p,q) \geq \delta\). Since \(q \in T'\), the ball \(B_\delta(q)\) contains a point \(t \in T\) with \(t \neq q\); and \(t \neq p\) as \(p \notin B_\delta(q)\). So \(B_\epsilon(p)\) contains a point of \(T\) other than \(p\). As \(\epsilon\) was arbitrary, \(p \in T'\).
(b) If every ball about \(p\) contains infinitely many points of \(T\), then each contains one different from \(p\), so \(p \in T'\). Conversely let \(p \in T'\) and suppose some \(B_\epsilon(p)\) contains only finitely many points of \(T\); list the ones different from \(p\) as \(t_1, \ldots, t_k\) (possibly \(k = 0\)). Put \(\delta = \min\{\epsilon, \rho(p,t_1), \ldots, \rho(p,t_k)\} > 0\). Then \(B_\delta(p)\) contains no point of \(T\) other than \(p\), contradicting \(p \in T'\).
(c) \(T = \{\tfrac{1}{n} \mid n \in \mathbb{N}\}\) has \(T' = \{0\}\) and \(0 \notin T\). And \(T = \mathbb{Q}\) has \(T' = \mathbb{R}\), since every interval contains infinitely many rationals.
Long solution #
Strategy. Everything rests on the definition: \(p \in T'\) iff every ball \(B_\epsilon(p)\) contains a point of \(T\) different from \(p\). Part (a) is a “two-step approximation”: a limit point of limit points is approached by limit points, each of which is approached by points of \(T\); the only care needed is to make sure the point of \(T\) we find is not \(p\) itself. Part (b) upgrades “a point other than \(p\)” to “infinitely many points” by a shrinking argument that uses the finiteness of a minimum. Part (c) is a matter of knowing two standard examples.
Part (a). We use the theorem from class: \(A\) is closed iff \(A' \subseteq A\). Applied to \(A = T'\), we must show that every limit point of \(T'\) is a limit point of \(T\).
Let \(p \in (T')'\) and fix \(\epsilon > 0\). Since \(p\) is a limit point of \(T'\), there is a point \(q \in T'\) with \(q \neq p\) and \(\rho(p,q) < \epsilon\). Let
$$ \delta = \min\{\, \rho(p,q),\ \epsilon - \rho(p,q) \,\}, $$which is positive because \(0 < \rho(p,q) < \epsilon\). Two things are true of the ball \(B_\delta(q)\):
- \(B_\delta(q) \subseteq B_\epsilon(p)\): if \(\rho(q,y) < \delta\) then \(\rho(p,y) \leq \rho(p,q) + \rho(q,y) < \rho(p,q) + (\epsilon - \rho(p,q)) = \epsilon\).
- \(p \notin B_\delta(q)\): because \(\rho(q,p) = \rho(p,q) \geq \delta\).
Since \(q \in T'\), the ball \(B_\delta(q)\) contains a point \(t \in T\) with \(t \neq q\). By (1), \(t \in B_\epsilon(p)\); by (2), \(t \neq p\). So \(B_\epsilon(p)\) contains a point of \(T\) different from \(p\). As \(\epsilon > 0\) was arbitrary, \(p \in T'\). Hence \((T')' \subseteq T'\) and \(T'\) is closed. \(\blacksquare\)
Alternative. One can instead show the complement of \(T'\) is open. If \(p \notin T'\), some \(B_\epsilon(p)\) contains no point of \(T\) other than \(p\). Then no point \(q \in B_\epsilon(p)\) with \(q \neq p\) can be in \(T'\) either, since a small ball about \(q\) inside \(B_\epsilon(p)\) and avoiding \(p\) contains no point of \(T\) at all. So \(B_\epsilon(p) \cap T' \subseteq \{p\}\), and if \(p \in T'\) we would have a contradiction, so in fact \(B_\epsilon(p) \subseteq (T')^c\).
Part (b). (\(\Leftarrow\)) If every ball \(B_\epsilon(p)\) contains infinitely many points of \(T\), then in particular it contains at least one point other than \(p\). So \(p \in T'\).
(\(\Rightarrow\)) Suppose \(p \in T'\) but that some ball \(B_\epsilon(p)\) contains only finitely many points of \(T\). Remove \(p\) from this list if it is there, and call the remaining points \(t_1, \ldots, t_k\); each satisfies \(\rho(p,t_i) > 0\). Define
$$ \delta = \min\{\, \epsilon,\ \rho(p,t_1),\ \ldots,\ \rho(p,t_k) \,\} > 0, $$a minimum of finitely many positive numbers, hence positive. (If \(k = 0\), take \(\delta = \epsilon\).) Any point of \(T\) in \(B_\delta(p)\) lies in \(B_\epsilon(p)\), so it is \(p\) or one of the \(t_i\); but \(\rho(p,t_i) \geq \delta\) excludes every \(t_i\). Thus \(B_\delta(p)\) contains no point of \(T\) other than \(p\), contradicting \(p \in T'\). \(\blacksquare\)
Consequences. A finite set has no limit points, because a ball cannot contain infinitely many of its points. So a finite set vacuously contains all its limit points and is closed, which recovers Problem IV.2. More generally, a set with no limit points at all, such as \(\mathbb{Z} \subset \mathbb{R}\), is automatically closed.
Part (c). First example. Let \(T = \{\tfrac{1}{n} \mid n \in \mathbb{N}\}\). The point \(0\) is a limit point: given \(\epsilon > 0\), choose \(n > 1/\epsilon\); then \(0 < \tfrac{1}{n} < \epsilon\), so \(B_\epsilon(0)\) contains a point of \(T\) other than \(0\). No other real number is a limit point: a ball of small enough radius about \(\tfrac{1}{n}\) contains no other point of \(T\), a ball about a negative number or a number greater than \(1\) can be chosen to miss \(T\), and a number in \((0,1)\) that is not of the form \(\tfrac{1}{n}\) lies strictly between two consecutive points \(\tfrac{1}{n+1} < x < \tfrac{1}{n}\), so a small ball about it misses \(T\). Thus \(T' = \{0\}\), which is non-empty, while \(0 \notin T\), so \(T \cap T' = \varnothing\).
Second example. Let \(T = \mathbb{Q}\). For any \(p \in \mathbb{R}\) and \(\epsilon > 0\), the interval \((p - \epsilon, p + \epsilon)\) contains a rational number different from \(p\) (indeed infinitely many), by the density of \(\mathbb{Q}\) in \(\mathbb{R}\). So every real number is a limit point of \(\mathbb{Q}\) and \(T' = \mathbb{R}\). The irrationals work equally well.
Remark. Compare the first example with the definition \(\overline{T} = T \cup T'\): here \(\overline{T} = T \cup \{0\}\), the set which will reappear in Problem V.7 as a compact set, while \(T\) itself is not closed.