Summary for Policymakers: The Science of Climate
Change - IPCC Working Group I
Contents
- Greenhouse gas concentrations have continued
to increase
- Anthropogenic aerosols tend to produce
negative radiative forcings
- Climate has changed over the past century
- The balance of evidence suggests a
discernible human influence on global climate
- Climate is expected to continue to change in
the future
- There are still many uncertainties
Considerable progress has been made in the understanding of
climate change1 science since 1990 and new data and analyses have become
available.
Increases in greenhouse gas concentrations since
preindustrial times (i.e., since about 1750) have led to a positive radiative forcing2
of climate, tending to warm the surface and to produce other changes of climate.
- The atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases, inter
alia, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) have grown
significantly: by about 30%, 145%, and 15%, respectively (values for 1992). These trends
can be attributed largely to human activities, mostly fossilfuel use, landuse change
and agriculture.
- The growth rates of CO2, CH4 and N2O concentrations were low
during the early 1990s. While this apparently natural variation is not yet fully
explained, recent data indicate that the growth rates are currently comparable to those
averaged over the 1980s.
- The direct radiative forcing of the longlived greenhouse
gases (2.45 Wm2) is due primarily to increases in the concentrations of CO2 (1.56
Wm2), CH4 (0.47 Wm2) and N2O (0.14 Wm2) (values for 1992).
- Many greenhouse gases remain in the atmosphere for a long
time (for CO2 and N2O, many decades to centuries), hence they affect radiative forcing on
long timescales.
- The direct radiative forcing due to the CFCs and HCFCs
combined is 0.25 Wm2. However, their net radiative forcing is reduced by about 0.1 Wm2
because they have caused stratospheric ozone depletion which gives rise to a negative
radiative forcing.
- Growth in the concentration of CFCs, but not HCFCs, has
slowed to about zero. The concentrations of both CFCs and HCFCs, and their consequent
ozone depletion, are expected to decrease substantially by 2050 through implementation of
the Montreal Protocol and its Adjustments and Amendments.
- At present, some longlived greenhouse gases (particularly
HFCs (a CFC substitute), PFCs and SF6) contribute little to radiative forcing but their
projected growth could contribute several per cent to radiative forcing during the 21st
century.
- If carbon dioxide emissions were maintained at near current
(1994) levels, they would lead to a nearly constant rate of increase in atmospheric
concentrations for at least two centuries, reaching about 500 ppmv (approaching twice the
preindustrial concentration of 280 ppmv) by the end of the 21st century.
- A range of carbon cycle models indicates that stabilization
of atmospheric CO2 concentrations at 450, 650 or 1000 ppmv could be achieved only if
global anthropogenic CO2 emissions drop to 1990 levels by, respectively, approximately 40,
140 or 240 years from now, and drop substantially below 1990 levels subsequently.
- Any eventual stabilized concentration is governed more by
the accumulated anthropogenic CO2 emissions from now until the time of stabilization than
by the way those emissions change over the period. This means that, for a given stabilized
concentration value, higher emissions in early decades require lower emissions later on.
Among the range of stabilization cases studied, for stabilization at 450, 650 or 1000
ppmv, accumulated anthropogenic emissions over the period 1991 to 2100 are 630 GtC3,
1030 GtC and 1410 GtC, respectively (approximately 15% in each case). For comparison the
corresponding accumulated emissions for IPCC IS92 emission scenarios range from 770 to
2190 GtC.
- Stabilization of CH4 and N2O concentrations at today's
levels would involve reductions in anthropogenic emissions of 8% and more than 50%
respectively.
- There is evidence that tropospheric ozone concentrations in
the Northern Hemisphere have increased since preindustrial times because of human
activity and that this has resulted in a positive radiative forcing. This forcing is not
yet well characterized, but it is estimated to be about 0.4 Wm2 (15% of that from the
longlived greenhouse gases). However, the observations of the most recent decade show
that the upward trend has slowed significantly or stopped.
- Tropospheric aerosols (microscopic airborne particles)
resulting from combustion of fossil fuels, biomass burning and other sources have led to a
negative direct forcing of about 0.5 Wm2, as a global average, and possibly also to a
negative indirect forcing of a similar magnitude. While the negative forcing is focused in
particular regions and subcontinental areas, it can have continental to hemispheric scale
effects on climate patterns.
- Locally, the aerosol forcing can be large enough to more
than offset the positive forcing due to greenhouse gases.
- In contrast to the longlived greenhouse gases,
anthropogenic aerosols are very shortlived in the atmosphere, hence their radiative
forcing adjusts rapidly to increases or decreases in emissions.
At any one location, yeartoyear variations in weather
can be large, but analyses of meteorological and other data over large areas and over
periods of decades or more have provided evidence for some important systematic changes.
- Global mean surface air temperature has increased by between
about 0.3 and 0.6°C since the late 19th century; the additional data available since 1990
and the reanalyses since then have not significantly changed this range of estimated
increase.
- Recent years have been among the warmest since 1860, i.e.,
in the period of instrumental record, despite the cooling effect of the 1991 Mt Pinatubo
volcanic eruption.
- Nighttime temperatures over land have generally increased
more than daytime temperatures.
- Regional changes are also evident. For example, the recent
warming has been greatest over the midlatitude continents in winter and spring, with a
few areas of cooling, such as the North Atlantic ocean. Precipitation has increased over
land in high latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere, especially during the cold season.
- Global sea level has risen by between 10 and 25 cm over the
past 100 years and much of the rise may be related to the increase in global mean
temperature.
- There are inadequate data to determine whether consistent
global changes in climate variability or weather extremes have occurred over the 20th
century. On regional scales there is clear evidence of changes in some extremes and
climate variability indicators (e.g., fewer frosts in several widespread areas; an
increase in the proportion of rainfall from extreme events over the contiguous states of
the USA). Some of these changes have been toward greater variability; some have been
toward lower variability.
- The 1990 to mid1995 persistent warmphase of the El
NinoSouthern Oscillation (which causes droughts and floods in many areas) was unusual in
the context of the last 120 years.
Any humaninduced effect on climate will be superimposed
on the background "noise" of natural climate variability, which results both
from internal fluctuations and from external causes such as solar variability or volcanic
eruptions. Detection and attribution studies attempt to distinguish between anthropogenic
and natural influences. "Detection of change" is the process of demonstrating
that an observed change in climate is highly unusual in a statistical sense, but does not
provide a reason for the change. "Attribution" is the process of establishing
cause and effect relations, including the testing of competing hypotheses.
Since the 1990 IPCC Report, considerable progress has been
made in attempts to distinguish between natural and anthropogenic influences on climate.
This progress has been achieved by including effects of sulphate aerosols in addition to
greenhouse gases, thus leading to more realistic estimates of humaninduced radiative
forcing. These have then been used in climate models to provide more complete simulations
of the humaninduced climatechange "signal". In addition, new simulations
with coupled atmosphereocean models have provided important information about decade to
century timescale natural internal climate variability. A further major area of progress
is the shift of focus from studies of globalmean changes to comparisons of modelled and
observed spatial and temporal patterns of climate change.
The most important results related to the issues of
detection and attribution are:
- The limited available evidence from proxy climate indicators
suggests that the 20th century global mean temperature is at least as warm as any other
century since at least 1400 A.D. Data prior to 1400 are too sparse to allow the reliable
estimation of global mean temperature.
- Assessments of the statistical significance of the observed
global mean surface air temperature trend over the last century have used a variety of new
estimates of natural internal and externallyforced variability. These are derived from
instrumental data, palaeodata, simple and complex climate models, and statistical models
fitted to observations. Most of these studies have detected a significant change and show
that the observed warming trend is unlikely to be entirely natural in origin.
- More convincing recent evidence for the attribution of a
human effect on climate is emerging from patternbased studies, in which the modelled
climate response to combined forcing by greenhouse gases and anthropogenic sulphate
aerosols is compared with observed geographical, seasonal and vertical patterns of
atmospheric temperature change. These studies show that such pattern correspondences
increase with time, as one would expect, as an anthropogenic signal increases in strength.
Furthermore, the probability is very low that these correspondences could occur by chance
as a result of natural internal variability only. The vertical patterns of change are also
inconsistent with those expected for solar and volcanic forcing.
- Our ability to quantify the human influence on global
climate is currently limited because the expected signal is still emerging from the noise
of natural variability, and because there are uncertainties in key factors. These include
the magnitude and patterns of longterm natural variability and the timeevolving
pattern of forcing by, and response to, changes in concentrations of greenhouse gases and
aerosols, and land surface changes. Nevertheless, the balance of evidence suggests that
there is a discernible human influence on global climate.
The IPCC has developed a range of scenarios, IS92af, of
future greenhouse gas and aerosol precursor emissions based on assumptions concerning
population and economic growth, landuse, technological changes, energy availability and
fuel mix during the period 1990 to 2100. Through understanding of the global carbon cycle
and of atmospheric chemistry, these emissions can be used to project atmospheric
concentrations of greenhouse gases and aerosols and the perturbation of natural radiative
forcing. Climate models can then be used to develop projections of future climate.
- The increasing realism of simulations of current and past
climate by coupled atmosphereocean climate models has increased our confidence in their
use for projection of future climate change. Important uncertainties remain, but these
have been taken into account in the full range of projections of global mean temperature
and sealevel change.
- For the midrange IPCC emission scenario, IS92a, assuming
the "best estimate" value of climate sensitivity4 and including the
effects of future increases in aerosol, models project an increase in global mean surface
air temperature relative to 1990 of about 2°C by 2100. This estimate is approximately
onethird lower than the "best estimate" in 1990. This is due primarily to
lower emission scenarios (particularly for CO2 and the CFCs), the inclusion of the cooling
effect of sulphate aerosols, and improvements in the treatment of the carbon cycle.
Combining the lowest IPCC emission scenario (IS92c) with a "low" value of
climate sensitivity and including the effects of future changes in aerosol concentrations
leads to a projected increase of about 1°C by 2100. The corresponding projection for the
highest IPCC scenario (IS92e) combined with a "high" value of climate
sensitivity gives a warming of about 3.5°C. In all cases the average rate of warming
would probably be greater than any seen in the last 10,000 years, but the actual annual to
decadal changes would include considerable natural variability. Regional temperature
changes could differ substantially from the global mean value. Because of the thermal
inertia of the oceans, only 5090% of the eventual equilibrium temperature change would
have been realized by 2100 and temperature would continue to increase beyond 2100, even if
concentrations of greenhouse gases were stabilized by that time.
- Average sea level is expected to rise as a result of thermal
expansion of the oceans and melting of glaciers and icesheets. For the IS92a scenario,
assuming the "best estimate" values of climate sensitivity and of icemelt
sensitivity to warming, and including the effects of future changes in aerosol, models
project an increase in sea level of about 50 cm from the present to 2100. This estimate is
approximately 25% lower than the "best estimate" in 1990 due to the lower
temperature projection, but also reflecting improvements in the climate and icemelt
models. Combining the lowest emission scenario (IS92c) with the "low" climate
and icemelt sensitivities and including aerosol effects gives a projected sealevel
rise of about 15 cm from the present to 2100. The corresponding projection for the highest
emission scenario (IS92e) combined with "high" climate and icemelt
sensitivities gives a sealevel rise of about 95 cm from the present to 2100. Sea level
would continue to rise at a similar rate in future centuries beyond 2100, even if
concentrations of greenhouse gases were stabilized by that time, and would continue to do
so even beyond the time of stabilization of global mean temperature. Regional sealevel
changes may differ from the global mean value owing to land movement and ocean current
changes.
- Confidence is higher in the hemispherictocontinental
scale projections of coupled atmosphereocean climate models than in the regional
projections, where confidence remains low. There is more confidence in temperature
projections than hydrological changes.
- All model simulations, whether they were forced with
increased concentrations of greenhouse gases and aerosols or with increased concentrations
of greenhouse gases alone, show the following features: greater surface warming of the
land than of the sea in winter; a maximum surface warming in high northern latitudes in
winter, little surface warming over the Arctic in summer; an enhanced global mean
hydrological cycle, and increased precipitation and soil moisture in high latitudes in
winter. All these changes are associated with identifiable physical mechanisms.
- In addition, most simulations show a reduction in the
strength of the north Atlantic thermohaline circulation and a widespread reduction in
diurnal range of temperature. These features too can be explained in terms of identifiable
physical mechanisms.
- The direct and indirect effects of anthropogenic aerosols
have an important effect on the projections. Generally, the magnitudes of the temperature
and precipitation changes are smaller when aerosol effects are represented, especially in
northern midlatitudes. Note that the cooling effect of aerosols is not a simple offset
to the warming effect of greenhouse gases, but significantly affects some of the
continental scale patterns of climate change, most noticeably in the summer hemisphere.
For example, models that consider only the effects of greenhouse gases generally project
an increase in precipitation and soil moisture in the Asian summer monsoon region, whereas
models that include, in addition, some of the effects of aerosols suggest that monsoon
precipitation may decrease. The spatial and temporal distribution of aerosols greatly
influences regional projections, which are therefore more uncertain.
- A general warming is expected to lead to an increase in the
occurrence of extremely hot days and a decrease in the occurrence of extremely cold days.
- Warmer temperatures will lead to a more vigorous
hydrological cycle; this translates into prospects for more severe droughts and/or floods
in some places and less severe droughts and/or floods in other places. Several models
indicate an increase in precipitation intensity, suggesting a possibility for more extreme
rainfall events. Knowledge is currently insufficient to say whether there will be any
changes in the occurrence or geographical distribution of severe storms, e.g., tropical
cyclones.
- Sustained rapid climate change could shift the competitive
balance among species and even lead to forest dieback, altering the terrestrial uptake and
release of carbon. The magnitude is uncertain, but could be between zero and 200 GtC over
the next one to two centuries, depending on the rate of climate change.
Many factors currently limit our ability to project and
detect future climate change. In particular, to reduce uncertainties further work is
needed on the following priority topics:
- Estimation of future emissions and biogeochemical cycling
(including sources and sinks) of greenhouse gases, aerosols and aerosol precursors and
projections of future concentrations and radiative properties.
- Representation of climate processes in models, especially
feedbacks associated with clouds, oceans, sea ice and vegetation, in order to improve
projections of rates and regional patterns of climate change.
- Systematic collection of longterm instrumental and proxy
observations of climate system variables (e.g., solar output, atmospheric energy balance
components, hydrological cycles, ocean characteristics and ecosystem changes) for the
purposes of model testing, assessment of temporal and regional variability, and for
detection and attribution studies.
Future unexpected, large and rapid climate system changes
(as have occurred in the past) are, by their nature, difficult to predict. This implies
that future climate changes may also involve "surprises". In particular, these
arise from the nonlinear nature of the climate system. When rapidly forced, nonlinear
systems are especially subject to unexpected behaviour. Progress can be made by
investigating nonlinear processes and subcomponents of the climatic system. Examples
of such nonlinear behaviour include rapid circulation changes in the North Atlantic and
feedbacks associated with terrestrial ecosystem changes.
Footnotes:
1 Climate change in IPCC Working Group I usage refers to
any change in climate over time whether due to natural variability or as a result of human
activity. This differs from the usage in the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change
where "climate change" refers to a change of climate which is attributed
directly or indirectly to human activity that alters the composition of the global
atmosphere and which is in addition to natural climate variability observed over
comparable time periods.
2 A simple measure of the importance of a potential climate change mechanism. Radiative
forcing is the perturbation to the energy balance of the Earthatmosphere system (in
Watts per square metre [Wm2]).
3 1 GtC = 1 billion tonnes of carbon.
4 In IPCC reports, climate sensitivity usually refers to the longterm (equilibrium)
change in global mean surface temperature following a doubling of atmospheric equivalent
CO2 concentration. More generally, it refers to the equilibrium change in surface air
temperature following a unit change in radiative forcing (oC/Wm2).
|