Ultracold Fermionic Atoms Team up as Molecules: Can They Form Cooper Pairs as Well?
The behavior of strongly interacting degenerate Fermi gases may hold clues to the universal behavior of many-body systems.
What a difference is made by one-half quantum unit of spin. Atoms with
integer spins--bosons--can collapse into a common ground state when sufficiently
cold; the result is a collective state known as a Bose-Einstein condensate
(BEC). But atoms with half-integer spins--fermions--are excluded from occupying
the same quantum states. The lowest-energy configuration they can reach is
to fill all levels up to the Fermi energy--the highest level that would be
occupied at absolute zero. It was formidable enough to form a BEC. Creating a degenerate Fermi
gas proved even more difficult, largely because Fermi statistics prevents
identical particles from participating in the kind of head-on collisions
required for the evaporative cooling that takes a gas to ultracold temperatures.
The cooling problem was solved, and a degenerate Fermi gas formed, in 1999
by a team from JILA, NIST and the University of Colorado, all in Boulder
(see Physics Today, October 1999, page 17).
Since then, a number of groups around the world have built up the
expertise to form degenerate Fermi gases as well as BECs. The door is open
to explore further the interface between the bosonic and fermionic worlds.
Recently several groups have created bosonic molecules from fermionic atoms,
and they have found that the molecules live long enough to allow the formation
of a molecular BEC. It should now be very interesting to study what happens
when ultracold bosonic molecules dissociate into their fermionic constituents.
A prime motivation for the current experiments, however, is the
desire to make atoms team up not as molecules--two tightly bound fermions--but
as Cooper pairs--fermions that are loosely correlated in momentum space.
The paired fermions would resemble the electron pairs in a Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer
superconductor. Because such fermion pairs are a composite boson, they can
occupy a common ground state and hence become a superfluid. There would be no hope of seeing such a superfluid, however, unless
it existed at temperatures accessible by the experiments. For these experiments,
the gases are typically cooled to a few tenths of the thermal temperature
TF corresponding to the Fermi energy (Typically, TF ≈ 1 μK.)
Fortunately, theorists have predicted that a novel superfluid phase
might, indeed, exist at such temperatures--provided the degenerate Fermi
gas is in the regime where interatomic forces are strong and attractive.1
Happily, atomic researchers can control the sign and strength of
such interatomic forces by applying a magnetic field. A number of current
experiments are in the right regime to form a superfluid; the experimental
challenge now is to prove that it's there. Tuning the magnetic force to a particular strength may create Cooper
pairs; tuning it to a different field value may promote the formation of
molecules. The magnetic field thus becomes a powerful control knob, allowing
researchers to explore the behavior of atomic gases as a function of the
interaction forces. Many researchers dream one day of taking a system of
particles smoothly from a molecular BEC to a BCS-type superfluid. There's another reason for interest in the current experiments on
degenerate Fermi gases: Ultracold, low-density atomic gases provide a useful
environment to probe and control quantum phenomena. They offer a way to explore,
in a tabletop experiment, the universal behavior of systems of strongly interacting
particles. Theorists expect--and experimenters are beginning to show--that,
in the strong-interaction region, the behavior of the atoms becomes universal,
or independent of the details of the atomic potential.2,3
Theorist Jason Ho of Ohio State University notes that studies in the region
of strong interactions, where perturbation approximations no longer hold,
should shed light on some of the most intractable problems in a variety of
fields.
Tuning the interaction
The applied magnetic field is able to control the sign and size of the
interatomic forces through its impact on a parameter known as the S-wave scattering length, a. When a is much less than the interparticle spacing, the scattering cross section varies as a2 and the mean-field interaction energy goes as na, where n
is the density of atoms. (The mean-field energy is the average potential
energy felt by one atom due to the presence of all the other atoms in the
gas.)
For most values of magnetic field, a
is small and relatively independent of the magnetic field. For certain values,
however, the magnetic field causes the collisional energy between two atoms
to approach the energy of a quasibound molecular state. At those values,
known as Feshbach resonances, the interaction is greatly intensified and
a diverges, as seen in figure 1. On one side of the resonance, a
is positive, which signals a repulsive force between atoms; on the other
side, it's negative and the force is attractive. Tuning the magnetic field
knob through this region can thus bring about dramatic changes in the behavior
of the gas.
When a exceeds the interatomic spacing, it's no longer valid to express the cross section or the mean-field energy in terms of a.
Doing so would cause those quantities to grow without limit, in violation
of the unitarity principle, which imposes a limit on the S-wave scattering
cross section. Instead, the mean-field energy approaches a constant fraction
of the Fermi energy. Without the dependence on a, the only length
scale in the problem is the interparticle spacing, and the behavior should
be universal for all strongly interacting particles.
Also in the region of large a, many-body effects become
important, and the system behavior can no longer be described as the sum
of interactions between pairs of atoms. A number of theorists from different
fields have suggested that, in the unitarity limit, such many-body correlations
result in an effective attractive interaction. Several recent experiments performed on degenerate Fermi gases near
Feshbach resonances have seen some of the effects predicted for large a.
John Thomas and his coworkers at Duke University saw a hint of universal
interaction in the expansion of a degenerate Fermi gas of lithium-6 atoms.4
Cindy Regal and Deborah Jin of the JILA-NIST-Colorado team in Boulder saw
saturation effects in their measurements of the mean-field energy in a potassium-40
gas.5 Christophe Salomon of the Ecole Normale
Supérieure in Paris (ENS) and his collaborators from the ENS, the FOM Institute
in Amsterdam, and the Kurchatov Institute in Moscow found evidence that the
interaction in their 6Li gas remains finite and attractive throughout the resonance region.6 That finding was echoed by data from Wolfgang Ketterle and his team from MIT.7
Ketterle says that, although in hindsight one can make a case for
the breakdown of the scattering-length picture, he was completely surprised
to see such strong interactions without strong losses by inelastic collisions.
"I never thought that we would so soon be in a regime where we need new many-body
theory."
Radio-frequency spectroscopy
To detect the saturation of the mean-field energy in their degenerate
Fermi gases, the Boulder and MIT teams introduced a new experimental technique:
radio-frequency spectroscopy. That technique was used in a two-component
Fermi gas--that is, a mixture of atoms with two different Zeeman spin states.
For example, all the 40K atoms in the Fermi gas used by Jin and her Boulder colleagues have total atomic spin of f = 9/2, but each atom can be in a different Zeeman spin state, described by the quantum number mf. The Boulder group selects a mixture of two spin states, such as mf = -9/2 and mf = -7/2.
With an RF pulse, one can transfer atoms between the two spin states,
and the transition is detected as a narrow spectral line. The presence of
atoms in a third spin state, however, can slightly change the energy difference
between the original two spin states, shifting and broadening the RF transition
between them. This effect is illustrated in figure 2a,
from the experiment by Ketterle and his MIT group. The observed change in
frequency is a measure of the system's mean-field energy.
Figure 2b
is a plot of the frequency shifts as a function of magnetic field. They are
compared to a curve predicted by the theory of dilute atomic gases. Away
from the Feshbach resonance, the data points line up along the curve. Within
the resonance region, though, the measured shifts are much smaller than theory
predicts. Regal and Jin obtained a similar result.
Formation of ultracold molecules
For several years, experimental groups have used various techniques to coax ultracold atoms to pair as molecules (see Physics Today, September 2000, page 46).
Until recently, most efforts began with bosonic atoms, some within BECs.
Now, there's great interest in forming molecules from fermions. In the process,
atoms would move away from the governance by Fermi statistics to the rule
of Bose statistics. Regal, Jin, Christopher Ticknor, and John Bohn, all of the Boulder
group, reported in July that they had formed molecules from atoms in two
differing spin states.8 The researchers started with a degenerate 40K Fermi gas, consisting of atoms in the mf = -9/2 and mf =
-5/2 states. They held these atoms at a magnetic field just above the Feshbach
resonance, where the interactions are attractive. For this system, molecule
formation is expected on the other side of the Feshbach resonance. The experimenters
ramped down adiabatically through the resonance region until, about mid-resonance,
they saw a sudden decrease in the number of atoms. This dip could mean that
the atoms have entered molecules, but it might also mean that atoms have
simply been lost from the trap. To see if molecules had actually formed, Regal and her coworkers
probed with an RF pulse. The frequency was set so that any molecule that
might have formed would dissociate into mf = -9/2 and mf = -7/2 atoms. The presence of spin mf = -7/2 atoms, which were not initially present, was thus the signal that molecules had been formed. As seen in figure 3, such spin states did appear.
Since the Boulder paper appeared, a Rice University group9 and the ENS-FOM-Kurchatov collaboration10
have reported forming molecules from degenerate Fermi gases, and a team at
the University of Innsbruck has described molecule production from an ultracold
(but not degenerate) Fermi gas.11 All three
cite evidence that the molecules live for times on the order of at least
one second, compared to lifetimes of milliseconds reported by the Boulder
group. The longer lifetime means that the molecules can stick around long
enough to form a BEC. Jin said that she and her coworkers are finding that
the lifetime depends strongly on the magnetic field; they too are now getting
lifetimes approaching those in the other expriments. The experimental groups
report conversion efficiencies--percentages of atoms that enter molecules--that
range from 50 to 80%.
In the Rice experiment, Randall Hulet and his colleagues formed molecules from a degenerate Fermi gas of 6Li
atoms. Like the Boulder group, they ramped the magnetic field through a Feshbach
resonance. To confirm formation of molecules, the researchers reversed the
magnetic field ramp to return to the starting point; the missing atoms resurfaced
as the molecules dissociated. In the ENS-FOM-Kurchatov experiment, Salomon
and his collaborators, also working with a degenerate 6Li gas,
were able to count the number of atoms that had not been bound in a molecular
state; they also showed that the atom-to-molecule process is reversible.10
The Innsbruck group, headed by Rudi Grimm, conducted its experiment
above the temperature where a degenerate Fermi gas forms, and the field was
changed quickly rather than adiabatically. In contrast to the other experiments,
the molecules in the Innsbruck case were formed by three-body collisions.
The research team used a magnetic field gradient, as in a Stern-Gerlach experiment,
to separate the atoms from molecules. The lifetime of the molecules was longer,
perhaps because of the lower atomic density.
Toward a superfluid?
In their explorations of the strong-interaction regime, Thomas and his Duke colleagues found that their cloud of ultracold 6Li atoms, after its release from the trap, expanded rapidly in the transverse direction and very little in the axial direction.4
Such anisotropic expansion is a possible indication of superfluid hydrodynamics,
which is collisionless. However, it can also be a sign of collisional hydrodynamics
within the atomic cloud, as the Duke team and others have pointed out. Superfluidity in a Fermi gas may reveal itself only through subtle
signals. For all we know, several of the ongoing experiments may already
have formed a superfluid. But how can it be detected? Hulet suggests that
proving the presence of superfluidity may take several pieces of evidence--perhaps
the observation of a superconductivity-like energy gap plus the sighting
of resistance-free flow. At the European Laboratory for Nonlinear Spectroscopy at the University
of Florence, Massimo Inguscio and his colleagues are following a different
strategy to reach fermionic superfluidity. They plan to use bosons as the
glue for fermions, much as bosonic phonons help to couple the electrons in
BCS superconductors. Inguscio's group has found that a mixture of potassium-40
atoms (fermions) and rubidium-87 atoms (bosons) has a naturally strong and
attractive interspecies interaction, which should favor the pairing of fermions
even in the absence of an external magnetic field.12
The researchers also note that they can further increase the natural interspecies
interaction by using a magnetic field to approach a Feshbach resonance.13
"We are also taking that approach," says team member Giovanni Modugno, "to
try to form a heteronuclear molecule, which should have a permanent electric
dipole moment." No doubt all the experimental groups are now planning how to conduct
the hunt for a superfluid. They have caught a whiff of their prey and are
on its trail. In the meantime, they are enjoying the hunt.
Barbara Goss Levi
4. K. M. O'Hara et al., Science 298, 2179 (2002); M. E. Gehm et al., Phys. Rev. A 68, 011401R (2003).
2003 American Institute of Physics
|
|
Company Spotlight
Sponsored links
|